Xiaomi 15 Ultra sabotages itself on the global stage, is there a reason for it?
Xiaomi 15 Ultra sabotages itself on the global stage, is there a reason for it?
[ad_1]
The global version of Xiaomi 15 Ultra out is an amazing phone with some really great devices. our Xiaomi 15 Ultra Review indicates that mainly is just a very great camera with a phone connected to it. It's a very good phone.
However, the version that was launched outside China continues the direction of its predecessor and comes with a poor battery compared to its local counterpart. Xiaomi 15 Ultra In China comes a 6000 mAh battery per hour and the global variable comes with 5410 mAh per hour. The phone still has a truly excellent battery life but why does it give us a smaller battery in the first place?
Xiaomi needs every feature that can get the control of Samsung and Apple dominance. So why - along with other Chinese manufacturers - continues to sabotage themselves?
Reducing costs for the global public?
Credit Image - Phonearena
One of the reasons that come to mind is that Xiaomi is simply reducing costs where it can. The Chinese smartphone industry has become very competitive over the past few years. It has reached the point where consumers in China began to shift from iPhone to local offers instead.
Meanwhile, Samsung and Apple offers are almost not innovative. The pioneer in Galaxy and iPhone continues to make the same decisions, which is the same amount of RAM (From artificial intelligence, this finally changes) And the same battery capabilities. Why does Xiaomi spend additional money to provide larger batteries in a market that suffers from a severe shortage of it? But again, the largest batteries are almost more expensive. It adds costs, but will Xiaomi really risk its global image for a little profit?
View and demand
Credit Image - Phonearena
Another reason is that the global alternative to Xiaomi 15 Ultra charging with a smaller battery: supply and order. Simply put, Xiaomi may not have enough resources to manufacture larger batteries per 15 high in the world.
If this is the case, the Chinese market in the homeland takes priority due to the competitiveness mentioned above. International consumers are already accustomed to smaller batteries on their phones so that they don't really complain, right?
Well ... perhaps.
Is it really important?
Is it actually important that we got a smaller battery? I will say yes. correct: Xiaomi 15 Ultra -impressive watches but did not come first in comparison. He has always won either either Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or iPhone 16 Pro Max.
Moreover, as a huge supporter to improve the battery life of phones, I generally feel upset to see the global release reduction. Some people argue that the current battery time on most smartphones is good enough unless they are attached to your phone. Well ... I stick to my phone after that. Give me a phone that one day without the need to recharge.
This does not help despite the great strength Xiaomi 15 Fast drawing is still slower than Galaxy S25 Ultra. It only picks up the last few percentage of the shipping and completing them just six minutes than the pioneer in Samsung. the OnePlus 13, on the other hand, quickly shoots and leaves all his competitors in dust.
Stop reducing the global value!
Photo suspension. | Credit Image - Phonearena
the Xiaomi 15 Ultra is almost the first time that the Chinese manufacturer has given less priority to the global market. Take Vivo X200 Ultra, for example: a great phone that will never see internationally like its predecessor.
Chinese phone manufacturers also continue to refuse to adopt some American teams that transport American consumers. Although it can be made an argument that American transport companies prevent them from doing this. at least Xiaomi 15 Ultra has finally taken some steps to address this but the primary model should also do this in my opinion.
Not to issue the best variables at the international level, not to adopt American teams and not to provide the same specifications that really harm these companies. It is bad for business, which is bad for the consumer. Samsung and Apple need a competition in the United States, but this is not the way you wander, or low prices.
The global version of Xiaomi 15 Ultra out is an amazing phone with some really great devices. our Xiaomi 15 Ultra Review indicates that mainly is just a very great camera with a phone connected to it. It’s a very good phone.
However, the version that was launched outside China continues the direction of its predecessor and comes with a poor battery compared to its local counterpart. Xiaomi 15 Ultra In China comes a 6000 mAh battery per hour and the global variable comes with 5410 mAh per hour. The phone still has a truly excellent battery life but why does it give us a smaller battery in the first place?
Xiaomi needs every feature that can get the control of Samsung and Apple dominance. So why – along with other Chinese manufacturers – continues to sabotage themselves?
Reducing costs for the global public?
Credit Image – Phonearena
One of the reasons that come to mind is that Xiaomi is simply reducing costs where it can. The Chinese smartphone industry has become very competitive over the past few years. It has reached the point where consumers in China began to shift from iPhone to local offers instead.
Meanwhile, Samsung and Apple offers are almost not innovative. The pioneer in Galaxy and iPhone continues to make the same decisions, which is the same amount of RAM (From artificial intelligence, this finally changes) And the same battery capabilities. Why does Xiaomi spend additional money to provide larger batteries in a market that suffers from a severe shortage of it? But again, the largest batteries are almost more expensive. It adds costs, but will Xiaomi really risk its global image for a little profit?
View and demand
Credit Image – Phonearena
Another reason is that the global alternative to Xiaomi 15 Ultra charging with a smaller battery: supply and order. Simply put, Xiaomi may not have enough resources to manufacture larger batteries per 15 high in the world.
If this is the case, the Chinese market in the homeland takes priority due to the competitiveness mentioned above. International consumers are already accustomed to smaller batteries on their phones so that they don’t really complain, right?
Well … perhaps.
Is it really important?
Is it actually important that we got a smaller battery? I will say yes. correct: Xiaomi 15 Ultra -impressive watches but did not come first in comparison. He has always won either either Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or iPhone 16 Pro Max.
Moreover, as a huge supporter to improve the battery life of phones, I generally feel upset to see the global release reduction. Some people argue that the current battery time on most smartphones is good enough unless they are attached to your phone. Well … I stick to my phone after that. Give me a phone that one day without the need to recharge.
This does not help despite the great strength Xiaomi 15 Fast drawing is still slower than Galaxy S25 Ultra. It only picks up the last few percentage of the shipping and completing them just six minutes than the pioneer in Samsung. the OnePlus 13, on the other hand, quickly shoots and leaves all his competitors in dust.
Stop reducing the global value!
Photo suspension. | Credit Image – Phonearena
the Xiaomi 15 Ultra is almost the first time that the Chinese manufacturer has given less priority to the global market. Take Vivo X200 Ultra, for example: a great phone that will never see internationally like its predecessor.
Chinese phone manufacturers also continue to refuse to adopt some American teams that transport American consumers. Although it can be made an argument that American transport companies prevent them from doing this. at least Xiaomi 15 Ultra has finally taken some steps to address this but the primary model should also do this in my opinion.
Not to issue the best variables at the international level, not to adopt American teams and not to provide the same specifications that really harm these companies. It is bad for business, which is bad for the consumer. Samsung and Apple need a competition in the United States, but this is not the way you wander, or low prices.
